The golden rule: design for the tools you own#
Design for Manufacturability (DFM) means making design choices that match your team's actual manufacturing capability. A part you cannot build, or build accurately, is worthless no matter how clever the CAD. Before designing, take inventory: Do you have a CNC router or mill? A waterjet? Only a drill press and band saw? Access to 3D printers? Your fabrication tools should shape your design.
Standardize on box tube and standard hole patterns#
The backbone of most FRC robots is aluminum 6061-T6 box tube in sizes like 1x1, 2x1, and 2x2 in (for example, AndyMark's box tube extrusion). The single most important DFM convention in FRC is the standard hole pattern: rows of 0.196 in diameter holes (a #10 clearance hole) on 0.5 in spacing. Designing to this pattern lets you:
- Bolt on COTS gussets, brackets, and bearing blocks that share the same pattern.
- Buy pre-drilled/pre-punched tube from vendors (WCP, REV, AndyMark) so you skip drilling hundreds of holes by hand.
- Swap and reposition mechanisms on a grid, which makes mid-season changes easy.
Prefer COTS structure when it saves time#
Vendors sell pre-cut and pre-drilled tube, gussets, bearing blocks, and gearbox kits. Buying these is often faster and more accurate than fabricating from scratch, especially for teams without CNC equipment. Use your limited shop time on the custom parts that make your robot unique.
Practical DFM guidelines#
- Use clearance holes, not interference fits, for bolts unless you specifically want a press fit; design holes around standard fasteners. The most common FRC fasteners are #10-32 and 1/4-20 socket-head cap screws — many veteran teams (e.g., Iron Panthers 5026) standardize on 1/4-20 for strength and consistency.
- Add fillets to inside corners of machined plates — sharp internal corners are impossible for a round router bit/end mill to cut and concentrate stress.
- Mind material thickness vs. tool. A waterjet cuts thick plate; a router handles sheet; a drill press makes holes but not slots.
- Use crush blocks / tube plugs where you bolt through thin-wall tube, to prevent the tube from crushing under fastener load.
- Lighten intelligently. Removing material (with tools like the Part Lighten FeatureScript) saves weight toward the 115 lb limit, but don't lighten so aggressively that parts flex or fail.
- Respect tolerances. Hand-cut tube might be +/- 1/32 in; a CNC mill holds far tighter. Design slots and adjustable mounts where you expect manufacturing variation.
Account for assembly#
DFM includes Design for Assembly: can a human actually reach the bolts? Can you remove a gearbox without disassembling half the robot? Leave wrench clearance and access. A part that fits in CAD but can't be assembled by hand is a manufacturing failure too.
Why it matters#
The teams that win consistently are usually the ones that finish a robust robot early and get practice time — and that comes from designs that build fast, accurately, and with the tools on hand. The Iron Panthers (5026) robust-design guide and the FRCDesign.org design handbook are excellent next reads.
Quiz - question 3 - I would change the question to: When is a tapped hole generally the preferred design choice? A. Whenever the joint must be as strong as possible. B. Whenever manufacturing cost is the only concern. C. When only one side of the part is accessible or there isn't room for a nut. D. Whenever a bolt larger than 1/4" is used. (correct answer C)
the part worth keeping
Key takeaways
- DFM means designing for the manufacturing tools and skills your team actually has
- Standardize on 6061-T6 box tube with the common 0.196 in (#10 clearance) holes on 0.5 in spacing so you can use COTS gussets and buy pre-drilled tube
- Buy COTS structure to save shop time; reserve fabrication for the custom parts that make your robot unique
- Add corner fillets, respect tolerances, use crush blocks in thin tube, lighten carefully, and leave wrench clearance for assembly
CAD & DesignManufacturability, Drawings, BOMs, and Design Reviewslesson 1 of 4
Keep going
Take the quiz+10 XP with an accountMore in Manufacturability, Drawings, BOMs, and Design Reviews
where this came from
Sources and corrections
This lesson is AI-assisted: drafted from primary sources, then reviewed and edited by hand. Errors still get through. When one is reported we fix it and write down what changed, in public, in the corrections log.
sources and further reading
- team5026.comHow to Design Robust FRC Robots (Iron Panthers 5026)
- frcdesign.orgFRCDesign.org Design Handbook — Structure
clipped to this lesson
Articles that go further on this
The lesson gets you through the topic. These go wider on it, and they read in one sitting.
answer sheet
Lesson quiz
All 3 right completes the lesson. Miss one and only that question comes back, anything you already answered correctly stays banked.
0 of 3 answered
01When choosing tolerances for an FRC part you plan to machine, what is the best general rule?
02Why do FRC teams design holes and slots around standard drill and end-mill sizes (e.g., 0.125", 0.196" for #10 clearance, 0.25")?
03From a manufacturability standpoint, how does a tapped (threaded) hole compare to a thru-bolted clearance hole?
Answer every question to submit.
All 31 lessons in CAD & Designopenclose
01 / prerequisites
02 / getting-started-cad-and-the-design-process
03 / onshape-fundamentals
04 / vendor-libraries-mkcad-featurescripts
05 / manufacturability-drawings-bom-design-reviews
06 / worked-examples-mini-projects
07 / common-mistakes-troubleshooting
- Not read yet:Mate & Assembly Failures: Why Parts Float, Spin, or Won't Move
- Not read yet:Broken In-Context & Derived References
- Not read yet:Slow Regeneration in Big Drivebase Assemblies
- Not read yet:Manufacturability Mistakes That Become Scrap
- Not read yet:Version Control & Team Collaboration Disasters
08 / advanced-techniques-case-studies
- Not read yet:Configurations vs. Parametric Variables: Designing One Model, Many Robots
- Not read yet:FeatureScript Automation for FRC
- Not read yet:Browser-Based FEA: Weight-Optimizing Real Structures
- Not read yet:Swerve System Geometry & Motion Math
- Not read yet:Case Study: FRC 6328's Modular Gusset-and-Tube Methodology