Every team runs outreach. Hall-of-Fame-caliber programs change the system around them — they create more teams, train more educators, and shape the policies that fund STEM. This is the difference between impact that ends when your demo ends and impact that compounds for years.
Level 1 — Direct outreach. Demos, library events, FLL/FTC support. Necessary, but its reach is bounded by your hours.
Level 2 — Multiplier programs (mentoring networks). Instead of reaching kids directly, create and sustain other teams. Team 1311 (Kell Robotics) has mentored 25 FLL teams, 1 FTC team, and 18 FRC teams — each of which then reaches its own students. This is leverage: your effort multiplies through the teams you start. Build a mentoring program with a curriculum, assigned student mentors, and a sustainability plan so the new team survives after you step back.
Level 3 — Training the trainers (professional development). The highest-leverage outreach develops educators, because one trained teacher reaches students for years. Team 1311 partnered with Kennesaw State University on a teacher professional development program providing 32 hours of professional credit focused on the engineering design process. A model like this turns your team into a teacher-training engine.
Level 4 — Systemic advocacy. The most advanced programs shape policy and funding. Team 1816 (The Green Machine) sends student delegates to advocacy efforts and contributed to language in the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) that released Title IV, Part A grant support for after-school mentored STEM activities including FIRST, plus language in the 2018 reauthorization of the Perkins Career and Technical Education Act. That is impact measured in laws, not demos.
Make it replicable. Advanced teams package what they build so others can copy it — published curricula, open-sourced resources, and presentations. A replicable model is itself a form of scaled impact: your program improves because others adopt and refine it.
The strategic ladder: Audit where your outreach sits today, then deliberately climb one level. If you only run demos, start a multiplier (mentor an FLL team). If you mentor teams, build a PD offering. If you train educators, engage advocacy. Each rung dramatically increases the number of people your program ultimately reaches — and is exactly what FIRST Impact Award judges and major funders are looking for.
Key takeaways
- Impact scales in levels: direct outreach → mentoring networks → educator professional development → systemic policy advocacy.
- Mentoring multiplies effort — Team 1311 mentored 25 FLL, 1 FTC, and 18 FRC teams, each reaching its own students.
- Training educators is the highest leverage; 1311's KSU partnership offers 32 hours of professional credit to teachers.
- The most advanced teams shape policy — 1816 contributed to ESSA Title IV and the 2019 Perkins reauthorization — and publish replicable models.
Keep going
Take the quiz · +10 XP with an accountMore in Advanced Techniques & Case Studies: Building a Hall-of-Fame-Caliber Program
Sources & corrections
This lesson is AI-assisted: drafted from primary sources, then reviewed and edited by hand. Errors still get through. When one is reported we fix it and write down what changed — publicly, in the corrections log.
Sources and further reading
- Team 1311 'Kell Robotics' — FIRST Hall of Famefirsthalloffame.org
- Team 1816 'The Green Machine' — FIRST Hall of Famefirsthalloffame.org
- FIRST Hall of Fame — Meet the Teamsfirsthalloffame.org
Read next
Articles on this, for competition day
The lesson covers how it works. These cover what to do when it breaks.
- 13 min read
FRC Awards Explained: Every FIRST Robotics Competition Award (Impact, EI, Autonomous & More)
A complete guide to every FIRST Robotics Competition award — Impact, Engineering Inspiration, Autonomous, Innovation in Control, Dean's List and more — with judged criteria and how to win.
Read - 7 min read
FIRST Impact Award Executive Summary: Questions + Fill-In Worksheet
The current FIRST Impact Award (formerly Chairman's) executive summary questions, character limits, a fill-in worksheet with per-question guidance, and what strong answers look like.
Read - 7 min read
FRC vs FTC vs VEX: Which Robotics Program Is Right for You?
FRC vs FTC vs VEX compared: robot size, cost, age range, season length, and programming, plus how to choose the right robotics competition for you.
Read
Lesson quiz
RequiredAll 4 right completes the lesson. Miss one and only that question comes back — anything you already answered correctly stays banked.
0 of 4 answered
01.What is the order of the levels through which a team's impact scales?
02.How does a Level 2 multiplier program (a mentoring network) leverage a team's effort?
03.Which activity is the highest-leverage form of outreach, and why?
04.What did Team 1816 (The Green Machine) do that exemplifies Level 4 systemic advocacy?
Answer every question to submit.
All 49 lessons in Business, Operations & Fundraising
- Not started:Mini-Project 1: A Working Season Budget Model
- Not started:Mini-Project 2: A Sponsor CRM in a Spreadsheet
- Not started:Mini-Project 3: A Grant Pipeline & Deadline Tracker
- Not started:Mini-Project 4: Auto-Generate a Sponsor Impact Report from The Blue Alliance API
- Not started:Mini-Project 5: A Competition Travel & Logistics Planner
- Not started:Should Your Team Become a 501(c)(3)? Structure Deep-Dive
- Not started:Multi-Year Financial Modeling: Reserves, Runway & Endowments
- Not started:Scaling Impact: From Local Outreach to Systemic Advocacy
- Not started:Case Study: Hall of Fame Programs Decoded
- Not started:Governance, Risk & Compliance for a Mature Program